Hey, all, it's been quite a while since I've made a post here, mostly due to my own incompetence, so I thought it was high time I got something out here. I'm currently working on a full-length review of a movie entitled The Werewolf of Washington (1973), but until I get that done, please enjoy this little look into Loch Ness Terror (2008).
Maybe a year ago, I bought a DVD combo pack from my local dollar store entitled Thrills and Chills Vol. 6, which included the movies Frankenfish (2004), Lake Placid 3 (2010), Piranha 2: The Spawning (1981), and most unfortunately, Loch Ness Terror. The only two of these movies that I've seen at this point are Frankenfish, which is pretty cool for a B monster movie, if a tad anticlimactic, and Loch Ness Terror, which is fun enough, but it is one of the most baffling movies I've ever seen for one big reason: It does not take place in Loch Ness. It doesn't even take place in Scotland, it takes place on Lake Surperior. This doesn't seem like too much of a problem for the majority of the movie (despite the obvious deviation from the title), because we're lead to believe that the sea monster is not the Loch Ness Monster, but just the same type of monster as Nessie. Then, at the end of the film, in a surprise twist, the movie's resident cryptozoologist reveals that she is in fact the very same infamous Loch Ness Monster. Like, what the hell? How on Earth do Jason Bourque and Paul Ziller (Writers of Loch Ness Terror) think the Loch Ness Monster got from Loch Ness in Scotland to Lake Surperior? It's absolutely nuts. I've since Tweeted this question at Jason Bourque (Paul doesn't seem to have a Twitter), so I'll keep ya'll in the loop on what the answer could be.
I hope this little tidbit of ridiculousness can tide you over until The Werewolf of Washington comes out.

Comments
Post a Comment